ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 15.68%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $210.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $353.19 which suggests that it could grow by 35.52%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.27x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 10.24x versus 6.55x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 36.86%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $210.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $516.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.16%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.27x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 10.24x versus 13.20x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of -41.27%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $210.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $227.55 which suggests that it could grow by 7.34%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.27x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 10.24x versus 18.36x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 15.4%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $210.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $96.54 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.494% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.884%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.27x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 14.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 10.24x versus 3.96x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.